BaFin - Navigation & Service

Nachhaltige Kapitalanlagen © BaFin

Erscheinung:30.01.2019 Supervisor and insurance industry exchange views during BaFin workshop

Sustainability of investments

How do insurers and institutions for occupational retirement provision (IORPs) implement the regulatory requirements for sustainable investments in risk management and where do the challenges lie? These questions were the focus of the second workshop held by BaFin under the title “Sustainable investments in the insurance sector – integrating ESG criteria into risk management”.

The ESG criteria are sustainability criteria that insurers as institutional investors are increasingly incorporating into their investment and risk processes (see expert articles on the BaFin website dated 4 December 2017 and 3 July 2018). The abbreviation ESG stands for environmental, social and governance.

At a glance:What regulatory sustainability requirements already exist for insurers and institutions for occupational retirement provision?1

  • Section 315 (3) of the German Commercial Code (HandelsgesetzbuchHGB), which implements a 2014 European regulation: Certain large undertakings and groups must disclose non-financial and diversity information. The undertakings concerned are required to include in their group management report a statement containing information relating to non-financial key performance indicators, such as environmental aspects, to the extent that these indicators are necessary for an understanding of the undertaking's development or the group's position.
  • Section 144 (1) sentence 1 no. 1 (f) and sentence 2 of the German Insurance Supervision Act (VersicherungsaufsichtsgesetzVAG): If life insurance undertakings offer occupational retirement provision they must, at the start of the pension contract, provide current and future beneficiaries who are not at the same time policyholders with detailed information on how the provider takes account of ethical, social and environmental issues when using the contributions paid in.
  • Guideline 29 of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) on System of Governance: Insurers that are subject to Solvency II must also take account of the characteristics of the assets including sustainability in the regular review of their investment policy principles. Since the entry into force of Solvency II, these undertakings have, in principle, enjoyed freedom of investment. Nonetheless, they must comply with the regulatory standards based on the “prudent person” principle. This includes in particular section 124 of the VAG and the EIOPA Guidelines 27 to 35 on System of Governance.

Dialogue with the industry

In the first workshop on the topic (see July 2018 edition of BaFinJournal – only available in German) representatives of large and medium-sized undertakings reported on how the ESG criteria could reasonably be taken into account in risk management. The second workshop, which took place in Bonn in November, focussed on smaller undertakings. BaFin Director-General Dr Kay-Uwe Schaumlöffel and other BaFin experts discussed proportional approaches with representatives of these companies. Representatives of the German Insurance Association (Gesamtverband der Deutschen VersicherungswirtschaftGDV) and the German Association for Occupational Pensions (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für betriebliche Altersversorgungaba) were also present. Both confirmed that the industry is currently engaging intensively with the topic of sustainability in investments.

New regulatory requirements

BaFin's Senior Advisor Nadine von Saldern began the November workshop by outlining the regulatory changes relating to sustainability that are currently on the horizon. The focus here lies, in particular, on the legislative proposals of the European Commission published in May (see July 2018 edition of BaFin Journal – only available in German).

At a glance:Which regulatory changes relating to sustainability can insurers and institutions for occupational retirement provision expect to be faced with?2

  • Legislative proposals by the European Commission: The legislative proposals include regulations regarding investors’ duties and disclosure requirements, the classification of sustainable activities, indices and benchmarks, and advisory duties.
  • Article 19(1)(1)(b) of the Directive on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision (IORP II Directive): Member states must allow institutions for occupational retirement provision to take into account the potential long-term impact of investment decisions on environmental, social, and governance factors in accordance with the “prudent person” principle. The directive entered into force in January 2017 and replaced the previous IORP Directive (see Annual Report 2017). It must be transposed into national law by 13 January 2019. The corresponding draft act of the German federal government was published in September.
  • Article 25(2)(g) of the IORP II Directive: The risk management system of IORPs must in future also take account of environmental, social and governance risks relating to the investment portfolio and its management.
  • Article 30 of the IORP II Directive: Member states must ensure that IORPs prepare and, at least every three years, review a written statement of their investment-policy principles. The member states must provide for this statement to contain details on how the investment policy of the IORP takes environmental, social and governance factors into account.

The relevant provisions of the Directive on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision (IORP II Directive) are also relevant to institutions for occupational retirement provision.

Both the European Commission’s legislative proposals and the IORP II Directive contain sustainability requirements for Pensionskassen and Pensionsfonds (occupational pension schemes and pension funds) which go beyond the existing requirements. For example, Article 30 of the IORP II Directive stipulates that Pensionskassen and Pensionsfonds prepare a written statement of their investment policy principles. This statement must also address the question of how the investment policy takes environmental, social and governance factors into account.

Industry feedback

The company representatives reported on their previous experience and planned activities relating to the sustainability of investments. This focussed on the question of how ESG criteria could be integrated into risk management.

Some company representatives with many years of experience in this field presented possible approaches. They described their previous experience in taking account of ESG criteria in investment decisions and in risk processes and shed light on the challenges, for example in preparing positive and negative lists.

At a glance:Positive and negative lists

  • Positive list: This contains criteria used by an insurance undertaking to categorise a company, country or sector as sustainable.
  • Negative list: This is a single list with which insurance undertakings exclude investments in certain companies, countries or sectors on the basis of predetermined criteria. A negative list might include, for example, shares in companies that allow child labour, violate human rights or produce cluster munition.

The insurance undertakings emphasised the importance of a subjective approach that is unique to each undertaking in the definition of ESG criteria. Customer interests, the individual values of the undertaking and also the field of activity of the sponsoring undertaking play a decisive role in this, they stressed. In the consideration of ESG criteria, the secure financing of insurance payouts must be a priority.

Giving examples, the company representatives illustrated how their undertakings take ESG criteria into account at the level of the respective investment classes. In the case of direct investment in property, value is attached to environmentally-friendly building processes for energy-efficient buildings, for example, and in decisions to buy sovereign bonds, the respective state’s democratic constitution, approach to human rights and its measures to counter corruption are checked.

The representative of one Pensionskasse explained how institutions for occupational retirement provision are at present required to disclose ESG criteria to current and future beneficiaries. Here he discussed section 144 (1) sentence 1 no. 1 (f) of the VAG, in accordance with which life insurance undertakings that offer occupational retirement provision must, at the start of the pension contract, provide information on how the provider takes account of environmental issues when using the contributions paid in.

The speaker also dealt with future information obligations which, against the background of the European Commission’s legislative proposal, are currently a key focus in the insurance industry. The proposal provides for specific requirements concerning the disclosure of information, including information on how insurance undertakings and institutions for occupational retirement provision take ESG criteria into account in their investment decisions and risk processes.

Another company representative emphasized in his report that insurance undertakings and institutions for occupational retirement provision have long taken ESG criteria into account in their investment decisions. He argued that these undertakings are long-term investors and, as such, are inherently oriented towards sustainability.

Scenario analyses and climate stress tests

Marc Wolbeck, Head of the BaFin Division Basic Issues relating to Investments, announced that in 2019 BaFin will discuss the implementation of scenario analyses and climate stress tests in supervisory interviews with selected insurance undertakings and institutions for occupational retirement provision. Scenario-based analyses and stress tests can be helpful tools to quantify risks (see expert article on the BaFin website dated 3 July 2018). Conducting scenario analyses and climate stress tests will allow undertakings to better identify, assess, monitor, manage and control their environmental risks. Around six percent of insurance and reinsurance undertakings – with the exception of funeral expenses funds – and institutions for occupational retirement provision that fall within the scope of BaFin’s supervision already use climate stress testing as part of their investment risk management. This was revealed in an industry survey conducted by BaFin at the beginning of the year (see July 2018 edition of BaFinJournal – only available in German).

Conclusion

Concluding the workshop, Dr Schaumlöffel stated that, based on the industry feedback and the discussions held with the participants, BaFin is under the impression that many undertakings are already dealing intensively with the topic of sustainability, although their level of experience in this area may vary.

The discussions showed that the undertakings are positive about the future regulatory requirements. However, the participants argued in support of the freedom to choose their own method of taking ESG criteria into account in investment decisions and risk processes.

Author

Nadine von Saldern
BaFin Division Basic Issues relating to Investments

Please note

This article reflects the situation at the time of publication and will not be updated subsequently. Please take note of the Standard Terms and Conditions of Use.

Footnotes

  1. 1 This overview is not exhaustive. Please also see the information regarding the EIOPA consultation on page 25 of the December issue of BaFinJournal (only available in German).
  2. 2 This overview is not exhaustive.

Did you find this article helpful?

We appreciate your feedback

Your feedback helps us to continuously improve the website and to keep it up to date. If you have any questions and would like us to contact you, please use our contact form. Please send any disclosures about actual or suspected violations of supervisory provisions to our contact point for whistleblowers.

We appreciate your feedback

* Mandatory field